Tuesday , November 12 2019
Home / National News / Teaching degrees miss the mark on reading instruction

Teaching degrees miss the mark on reading instruction


“I suspect that’s a big factor in why we have a large number of children not meeting reading and writing benchmarks.

“Principals are saying it takes a few years to catch teachers up who haven’t been given this knowledge base as part of their training.”

However, the head of one education faculty said that universities teach all three components of English that are outlined in the Australian curriculum, which covers reading instruction, and teaching graduates meet Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership standards.

“If I showed you all the slides from powerpoints and lectures, you’d find that all those elements of reading instruction are in there, they just don’t always get packaged up exactly like that,” associate head of the school of education at the University of South Australia Sue Nichols said.


“I can tell you that we teach those things categorically. What I’d like to see is more connectivity between schools and teacher education so they can come in and see exactly what we’re doing.”

The new report finds that in some university courses, literacy isn’t taught beyond the second year and that about 9 per cent of teachers graduating in 2018 did not pass the literacy component of a compulsory test introduced by the federal government.

Paul McDermott, principal at Blue Haven Public School on NSW’s Central Coast, said there is an “enormous gap” between university students’ knowledge of reading instruction and the teaching strategies used by top-performing schools.

“It’s not just new teachers, we spend a lot of time training and retraining staff,” he said.

“We’re quite authentic to the research around reading and our results reflect that. [Teachers] are up and running very quickly but it does take them time to catch up to what we do as a school.”

Blue Haven Public has gone from improving student results in NAPLAN reading tests at well below the improvement rate of similar schools between 2012 and 2014 to having significantly above-average gains between 2016 and 2018.

Mr McDermott attributed the improvement to their use of evidence-based reading instruction, including a focus on the five essential elements of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension, which should be taught explicitly according to literacy researchers and the NSW Department of Education’s Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation.

“They’re taught very little of that at university and a lot of schools out there probably don’t have the systems in place to teach these things,” Mr McDermott said.

“If teachers came in highly trained in the evidence, that would certainly make a massive difference to kids.”

The report recommends that all initial teacher education programs be required to demonstrate that they include evidence-based reading instruction techniques in adequate depth to be accredited, that literacy units be included in every year of teaching courses to “prevent a long gap between study and practice” and that ability to teach reading be included in graduate standards.

Peak body Universities Australia did not respond to requests for comment.

Most Viewed in National


About admin

Check Also

Barnaby Joyce says sun’s magnetic fields cause bushfires. Science says…

“There’s just the the oscillation of the seasons. There’s a change in the magnetic field …