Monday , September 21 2020
Home / Environment / Hazelwood ‘pit lake’ proposal lacks environmental tick: residents

Hazelwood ‘pit lake’ proposal lacks environmental tick: residents

“We rely heavily on stream flows to get access to irrigation water,” says Gippsland beef farmer Angus Zilm.

“Stream flows are forecast to reduce in the next 40 years because of climate change, so we’re deeply concerned about the salinity levels and the impact any further loss of water will have on the environment.”

Hazelwood Power Station’s chimneys collapse after demolition in May.Credit:Joe Armao

Angus and his wife Josie Zilm own a farm near Sale on the lower Latrobe River. They hold a licence to pump water from the river and about half their 250-hectare property is irrigated to produce grass and fodder crops.

They’re also the founders of Latrobe River Irrigators, which has joined the Friends of Latrobe Water coalition – which includes Great Latrobe Park, Strzelecki Sustainable Futures and Voices of the Valley – to write to Planning Minister Richard Wynne.

An inquiry into the coal fire that burned for 45 days at Hazelwood in 2014 found using water to create “pit lakes” was likely to be the most viable way to achieve safe and stable rehabilitation of the mines, and would reduce fire risk.

The Hazelwood mine fire burned for 45 days.

The Hazelwood mine fire burned for 45 days.Credit:Keith Pakenham

But it recognised that “significant knowledge gaps” existed in relation to this rehabilitation approach, and recommended further investigations.

The state government’s own modelling shows that since 1995, stream flows in the Latrobe basin have dropped almost 30 per cent. This lack of flow increases salinity and the mouth of the Latrobe River at Longford has already been affected, says Mr Zilm.

Hazelwood plant and mine from the air in 2017.

Hazelwood plant and mine from the air in 2017.Credit:Jason South

Friends of Latrobe Water wants a “transparent and fair” process for mine rehabilitation planning. The works variation request that ENGIE has submitted to the state government has not been made public.

The group has urged the government to consider other options: desal water, recycled water, even piping surplus water from Melbourne’s waste treatment system in Werribee across the bay to Gippsland.

A spokesperson for Hazelwood said ENGIE Hazelwood acknowledged the mine fill option was dependent on long-term water availability and subject to environmental factors and climate change scenarios.


Arrangements would be in place so that in times of low rainfall or drought the mine filling rates can be reduced, they said.

Laura Melville, from Environment Victoria, said the gravity of the enormous project had not been properly explained to the community.

Germany is often held up as an example of successful coal mine rehabilitation. But without plenty of water to dilute contamination and salinity – not to mention a government willing to pay the $21 billion price tag – Hazelwood faces different challenges, she said.

The state government is due to release a Latrobe Valley regional rehabilitation strategy at the end of this month. A spokesperson for Mr Wynne said he would consider a referral for an EES.

Most Viewed in Environment


About admin

Check Also

Cowardice: what Morrison and Albanese have in common on climate

There are various nuances around the energy announcements of recent days, but there is a …