Sahil Bhasin, from building consultants Roscon, said increasing the claim period from 10 to 12 years was important because the two most-widely used flammable cladding materials – expanded polystyrene and aluminium composite panels – have predominantly been used in the past 15 years.
“We have completed many expert witness cladding reports in the last six months where the building was classed as ‘high risk’ but the occupancy permit was issued just over 10 years ago, meaning homeowners couldn’t make claims,” Mr Bhasin said.
“This is great news for our clients, who could now potentially save millions of dollars in rectification works.”
Mr Bhasin said homeowners’ claims were occasionally timed out by delays of up to two years in arranging Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal hearings.
“I can think of three or four buildings we’ve worked with where this would allow them to commence litigation against the builder,” he said.
Following a fire at the Lacrosse tower in Docklands in 2015 and London’s Grenfell tower fire in 2017, the Victorian government stepped up efforts to identify dangerous buildings.
Last year it promised $600 million for repairs and committed to chasing shonky builders through the courts on behalf of owners in the most serious cases.
A state government taskforce previously identified 432 extreme or high-risk buildings in need of repair.
Mr Wynne said the bill proposes separating Cladding Safety Victoria from the Victorian Building Authority, making it a stand-alone entity that would oversee the cladding rectification program.
“We’re leading the world in responding to this international problem and helping to ensure those who have done the wrong thing contribute to the cost of fixing their mistakes,” he said.
Get our Morning & Evening Edition newsletters
The most important news, analysis and insights delivered to your inbox at the start and end of each day. Sign up here.
Michael is a state political reporter for The Age.