Land clearing for agricultural activities is still permitted by the Native Vegetation Code and routine agricultural management activities such as felling isolated paddock trees, clearing vegetation from dwellings or building fences are not impacted by the new SEPP.
Former NSW Agriculture Minister Niall Blair, who led the state’s controversial land-clearing reforms in 2018 before leaving Parliament last year, said this policy didn’t “have farmers marching in the street”.
“Of course it’s very difficult to talk generally as most agriculture and horticulture businesses are different. But I would be more concerned about this koala SEPP if I was a developer rather than a farmer,” said Mr Blair, now a professor of food sustainability at Charles Sturt University.
“To think this is the policy that could potentially give Labor and the Greens an opportunity to govern over rural NSW and farmers is an issue I don’t think anyone could have foreseen, and I think a lot of people are still trying to figure out what is really at play here.”
Environmental Defenders Office head of law reform Rachel Walmsley said “there has been a lot of misinformation about the koala SEPP.
“This debate seems to be about a draft guideline sitting under a subordinate regulatory instrument. There is no change to the laws that currently allow the clearing of koala habitat,” Ms Walmsley said.
“It’s a real head scratcher why this has blown up into such a big debate.
“The new SEPP is a minor strengthening of the existing instrument. It doesn’t actually prohibit the clearing of koala habitat, in fact no areas are off limits under NSW laws.
“The koala SEPP would apply to a farmer if they were putting in a development application to their local council to do a development. But it’s highly likely that they would have had to get that assessed under the previous SEPP anyway.”
The new SEPP increases the number of tree species listed as koala habitat from 10 to 123 across the state – but regional variations apply.
SEPP regulations kick in when habitat trees are present in sufficient numbers to cause private land to be classed as core habitat. But assessments are required only when a development application is triggered under the local government’s regulations – such as a house over two storeys.
“The koala is a widely distributed species and it needs different trees in different areas,” said Australian National University ecologist Kara Youngentob, who contributed to the new scientific classification. “By recognising their diverse requirements, we can better protect them in the different places they live.”
The Koala SEPP was legislated in March following the Black Summer bushfires, which burned so much habitat federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley warned koalas conservation status might be upgraded from vulnerable to endangered in some areas.
Independent MP Justin Field said the koala SEPP “does not impact farmers going about routine business.
“The public would understand that with the koala facing extinction doing a basic assessment before a major land use change is totally reasonable,” Mr Field said.
“It beggars belief that … the National Party have decided to make this their hill to die on and have chosen now to blow the issue up.”
President of peak body Local Government NSW Linda Scott said “many of LGNSW’s member councils are strongly supportive of the new SEPP’s approach”.
A parliamentary inquiry said in June koalas were heading for extinction before 2050 unless there was urgent intervention to stop habitat loss.
Mike is the climate and energy correspondent for The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.