Once again Boel was opposed by her father’s lawyers, who argued that it was for the monarch, and not the court, to decide on such titles by decree. The court will hand down its judgment on October 29.
“Delphine’s position isn’t that she wants or doesn’t want to be princess,” her lawyer Marc Uyttendaele said.
“She does not want to be a child on the cheap, she wants to have exactly the same prerogatives, titles and qualities as her brothers and sisters.”
“As far as the title is concerned, it is not a prerogative of the court but a prerogative of the executive power, in our opinion,” said Alain Berenboom, the former king’s legal counsel.
“We assume that this case will finally end. It was painful for everyone, injuring all the parties which were involved in it, and King Albert was involved in it in spite of himself, without his asking it. So it is time for it to stop,” he added.
King Albert abdicated in 2013 in favour of his son Philippe, 60, citing health reasons. He has another daughter Astrid, 58, and another son Laurent, 56.
He finally admitted he was Boel’s biological father after the court ordered DNA test last January.
He only agreed to the test after the court threatened to fine him £4370 ($7696) for every day he refused and after a string of failed appeals from the king.
Jacques Boel, the man who raised her, was a successful industrialist and her mother, Baroness Sybille de Selys Longchamps, an aristocrat.
Boel’s mother is reported to have had an 18-year affair with Albert before he took the throne. The then-future king was a presence in Boel’s life for a time and she nicknamed him “Butterfly”.
The Telegraph, London