Thursday , October 29 2020
Breaking News
Home / Federal Politics / ACCC won’t change ‘core’ of code to regulate tech giants

ACCC won’t change ‘core’ of code to regulate tech giants

The code, announced by the competition regulator in July and expected to be legislated before the end of the year, would give media companies three months to strike a deal about payment for use of their articles. If there was no agreement, an arbitrator would make the decision.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has added a non-discrimination rule to stop Facebook and Google treating the content of news publishers differently based on whether they were eligible to participate in the code. Failure to comply could cost the tech giants $10 million, or up to 10 per cent of local revenue.

While traditional media companies like Nine, owner of this masthead, and News Corp have largely welcomed the draft code, both Google and Facebook have described it as “unworkable”.

On Wednesday, Facebook’s vice-president of public policy for Asia-Pacific, Simon Milner, told a parliamentary inquiry the code would make it uneconomic for news to exist on the social media giant’s local platforms. Facebook has previously warned users it will remove news from its platform and Instagram altogether if the legislation is implemented.

Loading

Sources close to Google say it is also considering the removal of search from the market. The tech giants are concerned about rules requiring them to provide advance notice of changes to the algorithms that power search results and news feeds, and sharing user data. Both companies are lobbying for changes to the arbitration process.

While Mr Sims will not budge on core elements of the code, he flagged the ACCC would “clarify” the requirements for Google and Facebook to provide this information.

“Google’s reaction to the algorithm notice change and the data issues were ones that we didn’t intend. They’ve read things in there that we didn’t intend,” Mr Sims said. “We will certainly clarify those, so I’m hopeful those will no longer be issues.”

He said whether these changes amounted to a watering down of the code was a matter of perspective, adding it was for Parliament to decide the final content of the code.

“There will be changes that some like and some don’t, but that core element that addresses the market balance won’t change,” he said. Mr Sims admitted he was uncertain whether Facebook would follow through with its threat to block Australians from sharing news on its platforms.

“At the end of the day, what they do is their call and I don’t know what they are going to do,” Mr Sims said. “I think it would be a shame for Australian democracy, a shame for Facebook users, if they chose that course of action.”

Get our Morning & Evening Edition newsletters

Most Viewed in Politics

Loading

About admin

Check Also

An intolerant, divisive Australian image is damaging us in China

The Chinese Communist Party has no Senate estimates, no public inquiries, no question time. Its …