Collingwood coach Nathan Buckley says “the hit-out stat is a furphy” after the Magpies won the count 63-4 but still lost to the Brisbane Lions at Marvel Stadium on Thursday night.
Despite the tap dominance of All-Australian Brodie Grundy up against the inexperienced pairing of Connor Ballenden and Tom Fullarton, the Pies only had a modest victory in stoppage clearances (24-17) and lost the centre clearances 13-11 on a night they were sunk by Zac Bailey’s set shot after the siren.
Clearly irked by the ongoing focus on Grundy, who starred with 28 disposals to go with his hit-outs, Buckley said after the game that the focus on the statistic was way over the top.
“The topics this week were Lachie Neale, obviously the ruck contests and probably Jordy De Goey whether he plays forward or mid. I get asked that question a lot. There’s an over-emphasis on certain parts of the game and one of the things that there’s an over-emphasis on is hit-outs. It’s not a stat that has a strong correlation,” Buckley said.
“And when you know you’re going to lose the hit-outs, you can actually set up pretty well at ground level to be able to buffer that. That’s what sides without a dominant ruckman do. Brodie’s not just a hit-outs ruckman, he follows up, he’s a midfielder and that’s what he provides to us. He played particularly well. The hit-out differential is largely irrelevant, it’s what we do at ground level with that. He still had hit-outs to advantage but the hit-out stat is a furphy.
“I probably don’t help because I’m going to reinforce the focus on that and maybe every coach will be asked this week about ‘what do you think about ruckmen and hit-outs?’ Can’t wait for that.
“But in the end, would Brodie have been one of the strongest performers on the field? I would have thought so.”
Buckley was philosophical about a game in which Collingwood led for almost the entirety.