“We will gratefully accept money as long as it’s upfront, legitimate and it’s for a worthy cause that council has identified as a priority. This council didn’t note any of those two car parks as a priority. And this council didn’t actually ask for that money,” he said.
“As we all know, that’s all a little bit sour and we need to be comfortable with that.”
The federal government initially offered Glen Eira the money on the condition it match the funding. After the pandemic hit and the council shelved its initial plans it successfully lobbied for the Commonwealth to cover the entire cost.
Since then, it has chosen two new sites after the community complained those first identified were too far from train stations and the planned multi-storey car parks were too large.
Councillors acknowledged the proposed new site in Bentleigh was probably a better outcome. However, councillor Tony Athanasopoulos cast some doubts over the future of the Elsternwick plans, saying it was a “complete move away” from the land use previously outlined.
Councillor David Zyngier said he would rather outright refuse the money but consulting the community was a sensible move.
“I don’t believe in taking money that’s tainted,” he said.
But mayor Margaret Esakoff said any reference to tainted or corrupt money was “purely wrong” given the probity report had cleared the council to accept the money.
The Baron Consulting report recommended the council establish a “probity firewall” to insulate itself from the federal department’s “sub-optimal administration of the grant process”.
Councillor Anne-Marie Cade went further, saying the council’s role was to get the best outcome for the community and “to give $20 million back and not use it would be reprehensible”.
“It would be naive to think that money is ever given by whichever political party if not with the intention of garnering more support or votes at an election. That is why money is given and promised just before elections,” she said.
Mr Wilson said the council was on record as noting the car parks were “priority projects” and urged it to get on with construction.
“Commuters across Glen Eira and Bayside are begging for more cark parking, it’s disappointing Glen Eira is putting petty council politics ahead of resident outcomes by turning down Commonwealth funding for ‘priority projects’ they submitted proposals for,” he said.
The council’s probity report found the federal Infrastructure Department approached Glen Eira “with an unsolicited offer to grant money” for station car parks.
Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, who promised up to 2000 car spaces at four railway stations in his own electorate of Kooyong, confirmed none of those had been built yet.
Pressed by Labor on the entire program, he revealed only a “majority” would be in place or under construction within the next 18 months.
The role of staff in Prime Minister Scott Morrison and then-urban infrastructure minister Alan Tudge’s offices in choosing the car park projects to fund will come under scrutiny in a new Parliamentary inquiry.
It is expected to examine who started and added to the list of marginal electorates the Auditor-General’s office says was used to decide the allocation of money. Mr Tudge says he wasn’t aware of the list.
The current minister, Paul Fletcher, has claimed the spreadsheet is a cabinet document and can’t be released for 20 years.
But junior minister Jane Hume said on Wednesday she wasn’t sure it existed.
“The minister at the time said that he hasn’t seen those spreadsheets and no one else seems to have been able to see those spreadsheets either, so it’s very hard to hand over documents that no one knows exist,” she said.
The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.