Professor Langton said the national plan that had existed for 12 years “does not work for us” and Indigenous representatives must be involved in designing local initiatives.
“Nobody listens to us. They talk over the top of us, they tell us what we are going to have in our communities, and no one listens to the women in the communities, the women in the towns, the women in the suburbs who have to deal with all those young women and older women and children fleeing from violence,” she told the summit.
“Lives are being lost because people who think they know better than us will not listen to us and will not act on our advice.”
Professor Creamer said the mainstream system “has not really been there for us” and had failed to address the specific dynamics of domestic violence in Indigenous communities.
Ms Oscar said without acknowledging or including diverse voices, policymakers wouldn’t be designing the right responses.
“We treat women as if they are homogenous, the same and that has got to end,” she said.
The government is open to their call for a separate plan. Senator Ruston heard the message that Indigenous women felt like they were an afterthought and understood that was not good enough.
“We are absolutely open to considering all of the ideas raised during the summit including how to best address the specific challenges facing Indigenous communities,” the minister’s spokeswoman said.
Mr Morrison promised members of his government had come with “open ears and open hearts” to learn from advocates and victims.
Many advocates watching the summit linked the Prime Minister’s words to a perceived lack of action on the 55 recommendations of the Respect@Work report. Legislation pushed through Parliament last week addressed just six of the recommendations.
Ms Jenkins pointed out only 12 of her recommendations required legislative change and said there had been “a lot of activity” since April on those that didn’t involve Parliament.
She saw that as a glass-half-full situation, saying “it could have been none” that went to Parliament.
“The other six, it has not been a no, but it would have been fabulous if they had all gone through – but that just wasn’t to be,” she said.
She will continue to advocate for those other recommendations, including adding the positive duty to the Sex Discrimination Act. That was “not off the agenda” but it was frustrating that it hadn’t been included, she said.
“From the very first day, I said, … ‘Of course, I want all of them but the one that is a missed opportunity and is central is the positive duty in the Sex Discrimination Act’,” she said.
“Governments don’t open the Sex Discrimination Act that much to amend it so I really welcome the advocacy to say, ‘well while you’re at it, why don’t you do the rest?’
“But who’s in government is in government so I guess I’m a bit pragmatic about that. But I’m not letting go.”